Development and Validation of an Augmented Reality–Supported Contextual Teaching and Learning Module for Projectile Motion

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64421/ijels.v2i1.36

Keywords:

Physics Education, Augmented Reality, Contextual Teaching and Learning, Module Development, Projectile Motion, ADDIE Model

Abstract

This study developed and validated a contextualized physics module integrating Augmented Reality (AR) for teaching projectile motion, addressing challenges related to abstract concepts and limited laboratory resources in physics classrooms. The research employed a Design and Development approach using the ADDIE model to produce a learning module that incorporates culturally relevant examples and interactive three-dimensional visualizations accessible through smartphones. The product was evaluated through expert validation and preliminary user testing. Validation by five experts resulted in very high ratings across all assessed aspects, with contextual relevance receiving the highest score (M = 4.75/5.00). Preliminary implementation involving 35 students indicated high levels of perceived practicality and user acceptance, particularly regarding engagement (M = 4.78) and the perceived usefulness of AR visualizations for clarifying projectile motion concepts (M = 4.62). Observational notes during implementation suggested that students actively related the AR simulations to real-world situations presented in the module. These findings indicate that the developed module demonstrates strong validity and practical feasibility as a technology-supported instructional resource that integrates Augmented Reality with Contextual Teaching and Learning principles. However, the study focuses on product quality evaluation through expert judgment and student perceptions; it does not measure learning effectiveness or learning gains. Future research may therefore investigate the instructional impact of the module through experimental or quasi-experimental designs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002

Andayani, A. (2025). Peningkatan Literasi Digital dan Kreativitas Guru Sekolah Dasar melalui Pelatihan Augmented Reality di Jakarta Timur. Indonesian Journal of Community Service in Education, 1(2), 80-89. https://doi.org/10.64421/ijcse.v1i2.29

Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355

Berns, R., & Erickson, P. (2001). Contextual teaching and learning: Preparing students for the new economy. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach (2nd ed.). Springer.

Brinson, J. R. (2015). Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical research. Computers & Education, 87, 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.003

Cai, S., Wang, X., & Chiang, F. K. (2021). Effects of augmented reality-based learning on students’ STEM knowledge and skills: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 174, 104300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104300

Chen, C., Lin, C., & Huang, S. (2022). Students’ misconceptions in kinematics: Causes and instructional strategies. Journal of Physics Education, 59(2), 123–135.

Cheng, K., & Tsai, C. C. (2019). Students’ perceptions of learning with virtual labs: Bridging the gap in under-resourced regions. Computers & Education, 142, 103647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103647

Ibáñez, M. B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.002

Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it’s here to stay. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Maharani, S. D., Pramudya, A., & Amira, S. (2025). Drivers of Adoption: How Innovation Attributes Influence the Diffusion of Digital Tools in Indonesia’s Merdeka Curriculum. International Journal of Education and Learning Studies, 1(3), 146-162. https://doi.org/10.64421/ijels.v1i3.26

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165

Prabowo, S., & Andayani, A. (2025). Augmented Reality as Catalyst for Digital Literacy Enhancement: Investigating University Students’ Readiness in the Era of Disruptive Educational Technologies. International Journal of Education and Learning Studies, 1(1), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.64421/ijels.v1i1.4

Radu, I., Schneider, B., & Schroeder, N. (2023). Cultural considerations in augmented reality-based science learning: A review of current practices. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71, 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10245-x

Skulmowski, A., & Rey, G. D. (2020). Embodied learning with augmented reality: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 5, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00115

Zhang, X., Liu, Q., & Wang, Y. (2020). Effects of augmented reality on learning outcomes in STEM education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 157, 103965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103965

Downloads

Published

30-04-2026

How to Cite

Axmed, Y., Warsame, S., & Abshir, A. S. (2026). Development and Validation of an Augmented Reality–Supported Contextual Teaching and Learning Module for Projectile Motion. International Journal of Education and Learning Studies, 2(1), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.64421/ijels.v2i1.36