From Policy Text to School Practice: Curriculum Coherence in Strengthening the Pancasila Student Profile in an Indonesian Primary School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64421/jirpd.v1i3.132Keywords:
Character Assessment, Character Education, Curriculum Coherence, Merdeka Curriculum; P5, Pancasila Student ProfileAbstract
The Merdeka Curriculum places the Pancasila Student Profile at the core of character education, yet its strengthening often remains confined to routine activities. This study analysed curriculum coherence, that is, the alignment of planning documents, instructional practice, and assessment, in strengthening the profile at a public primary school near Indonesia's new capital. This qualitative case study drew on [n] documents, semi-structured interviews with [n] participants, and limited observation, analysed thematically. The findings show that (1) curriculum documents were aligned with national policy but emphasised administrative compliance; (2) profile values were visible in school culture but rarely articulated explicitly in learning objectives; and (3) alignment among objectives, activities, and assessment was partial because character assessment lacked rubrics. The study proposes the notion of a symbolic–substantive gap and recommends mapping profile dimensions into learning objectives, developing character rubrics, and providing teacher professional development.
Downloads
References
Athahira, L., Afandi, M., & Kusumadewi, R. F. (2026). Analysis of independent curriculum implementation for improving learning quality in elementary education. International Journal of Education and Learning Studies, 2(2), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.64421/ijels.v2i2.86
Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2007). What works in character education. Journal of Research in Character Education, 5(1), 29–48.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. ASCD.
Coburn, C. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 211–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070407700302
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students' social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504676
Handoko, B., Mustadi, A., & Febrilia, Y. (2024). Implementasi projek penguatan profil pelajar Pancasila (P5) SD Negeri 1 Bantul. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 8(5), 876–892. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v8i5.6126
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Kemendikbudristek (2022a). Panduan pengembangan projek penguatan profil pelajar Pancasila. Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan, Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia.
Kemendikbudristek (2022b). Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Nomor 009/H/KR/2022 tentang Dimensi, Elemen, dan Subelemen Profil Pelajar Pancasila pada Kurikulum Merdeka. Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia.
Kemendikbudristek (2024). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 12 Tahun 2024 tentang Kurikulum pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah. Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia.
Kemendikdasmen (2025). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Nomor 13 Tahun 2025 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 12 Tahun 2024 tentang Kurikulum pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah. Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education of the Republic of Indonesia.
Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the standard for project based learning: A proven approach to rigorous classroom instruction. ASCD.
Lestari, S., Iasha, V., & Zulela, M. S. (2026). Implementation challenges of the Merdeka Curriculum in elementary schools: A CIPP-based systematic literature review (2023–2025). International Journal of Education and Learning Studies, 2(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.64421/ijels.v2i1.60
Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam Books.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Muna, L. F., & Zulela, M. S. (2026). Analysis of the implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum in strengthening character education based on Qur'anic vision in elementary schools. Jurnal Inovasi dan Riset Pendidikan Dasar, 1(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.64421/jirpd.v1i1.61
OECD (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030: OECD learning compass 2030. OECD Publishing.
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury Academic.
Rasworo, N. F., & Ramadan, Z. H. (2024). Implementasi projek penguatan profil pelajar Pancasila dalam mengembangkan karakter siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 8(5), 3638–3648. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v8i5.8571
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
Setiawan, B., Barokah, A., Hafifah, D. N., & Iasha, V. (2025). Enhancing environmental awareness through STEAM-based learning with ESD principles in elementary education. International Journal of Education and Learning Studies, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.64421/ijels.v1i1.1
Setyawan, T. B., & Ghita, A. M. (2026). Analysis of educational unit curriculum documents and their implications in supporting deep learning and local cultural integration in elementary schools with the CIPP model. Jurnal Inovasi dan Riset Pendidikan Dasar, 1(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.64421/jirpd.v1i1.58
Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.
Trisnawati, F. P., Anjani, D., & Widya, M. (2025). Independent curriculum policy in elementary schools: Teachers' understanding and implementation challenges in Bekasi Indonesia. International Journal of Education and Learning Studies, 1(2), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.64421/ijels.v1i2.16
Ulandari, S., & Rapita, D. D. (2023). Implementasi proyek penguatan profil pelajar Pancasila sebagai upaya menguatkan karakter peserta didik. Jurnal Moral Kemasyarakatan, 8(2), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.21067/jmk.v8i2.8309
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (Expanded 2nd ed.). ASCD.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Young, M., & Muller, J. (2016). Curriculum and the specialization of knowledge: Studies in the sociology of education. Routledge.
Zulela, M. S. (2025). Character formation through culturally responsive teaching: Evidence from Indonesian primary schools. International Journal of Education and Learning Studies, 1(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.64421/ijels.v1i1.2
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Suminarsih Suminarsih (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
