Evaluasi Implementasi Kurikulum IPA Menggunakan Model CIPP di SMP Methodist Pancur Batu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64421/jirpd.v2i1.57

Keywords:

Evaluasi Kurikulum, Model CIPP, Kurikulum Merdeka, Pendidikan Dasar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi iplementasi Kurikulum Merdeka di satuan pendidikan dasar dengan menggunakan model CIPP ( Context, Input, Process, Product). Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif evaluatif. Teknik pengumpulan data di lakukan melalui analisis dokumen, wawancara, dan observasi terbatas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) pada aspek konteks, kurikulum sekolah telah selaras dengan tujuan pendidikan nasional dan visi satuan pendidikan; (2) pada aspek input, kualifikasi guru dan kelengkapan dokumen kurikulum secara umumtelah memadai meskipun sarana pendukung pembelajaran digital masih terbatas; (3) pada aspek proses, pelaksanaan pembelajaran telah menerapkan pendekatan berpusat pada peserta didik, namun belum merata di seluruh kelas; (4) pada aspek produk, implementasi kurikulum memberikan dampak positif terhadap hasil belajar dan penguatan karakter peserta didik, meskipun sistem pengukuran capaian pembelajaran masih perlu disempurnakan. Berdasarkan hasil tersebut dapat disimpulkan bahwa implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka tergolong cukup efektif dan memerlukan penguatan berkelanjutan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Ivo Lisna Warni Purba, Sultan Agung Islamic University

    Program Studi Pendidikan Dasar

References

Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teaching for deeper learning. Harvard Education Press.

Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504676

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.

Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601007549

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka: Kebijakan dan implementasi pembelajaran. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.

Krajcik, J., & Mun, K. (2014). Promises and challenges of using learning technologies in science education. In N. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 337–360). Routledge.

Lickona, T. (2012). Educating for character. Bantam.

Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2016). Data literacy for educators. Teachers College Record, 118(2), 1–42.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

OECD. (2019). Future of education and skills 2030: OECD learning compass 2030. OECD Publishing.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. Guilford Press.

Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suyanto, & Jihad, A. (2018). Menjadi guru profesional: Strategi meningkatkan kualifikasi dan kualitas guru di era global. Esensi Erlangga Group.

Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Buck Institute for Education.

Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2018). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world. Computers & Education, 121, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.012

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Widodo, H. (2020). Tantangan implementasi kurikulum di Indonesia pada era revolusi industri 4.0. Jurnal Pendidikan, 21(2), 115–128.

Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. Jossey-Bass.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31

How to Cite

Evaluasi Implementasi Kurikulum IPA Menggunakan Model CIPP di SMP Methodist Pancur Batu. (2026). Jurnal Inovasi Dan Riset Pendidikan Dasar, 2(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.64421/jirpd.v2i1.57

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.